Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Carlsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Anna Carlsson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

VA from Germany who had some roles in German and Swedish (??) language translations of anime and cartoons, but I don't see much coverage on the person in news or stuff that would demonstrate notability. She has a lead role in Kim Possible but how were the other shows? The synchronkartei database shows a bunch of them but is that an IMDb-like user generated database? AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's nothing suggesting the needed notability improvements, current information is not convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  20:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Searching for sources reveals little in English, German, or Swedish (in fact, most of the hits I found are flase positives). However, being the lead in a foreign dub of Kim Possible might be enough to establish notability. The database mentioned above says "staff login" which I think means it's not user-editable and can only be edited by website staff, and unlike ANN's encyclopedia, it appears that each role requires some source (usually a show's end credits), so it's possible that the source is reliable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Intro section see second-to-last paragraph says the webmaster is controlling the information in its entirety, listens with his own ears, checks closing credits, and reads newspaper announcements. There are light bulb icons on each entry so that people can send a request to edit an entry but he ultimately decides if it is valid or not. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * German Wikipedia references look promising. At least they have her agency profiles and resume:, although still primary sourced. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: Again, needs more sourcing, but let's not have an anti-children's programming attitude here. Dig a little and see what's out there.  Montanabw (talk)  21:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I would say keep for now, more of a search needs to be done. I say this as I am seeing major roles which would make her pass WP:ENT #1, this shouldn't give a free pass though if nothing is found to back up some of the roles stated in the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is strange. she has obviously had major roles. sources can probably be found by interested parties. we dont delete on article quality, size, etc.BabbaQ (talk) 21:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as has had some prominent roles and passes WP:NACTOR Atlantic306 (talk) 22:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.