Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Carter

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 06:21, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Anna Carter
Patent non-sense. Probably qualifies for speedy delete. But absurd claim of notability in *old* edit history made me take vfd route rob 11:11, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, are patently false staments assertions of notability?--nixie 11:14, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Reply: I personally would like a speedy delete, but I was just following what I thought were the rules.  If I was wrong (hope I am) than somebody should just do a speedy delete.  --rob 11:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you're perfectly right. However silly or unbelievable, this article does rather clearly assert notability. The CSD criterion text voted on specifically said: "If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to VFD instead." See Deletion of vanity articles. / Alarm 11:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete anyway. / Alarm 11:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this could have been speedied as some of the claims of notability are potentially libelous giving this page a history of being an attack page--Porturology 12:48, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment: I still want this article deleted as quick as possible, but in the meantime, I made the article be consistent with the single back-link to it.  However, the person (a senator's wife) is not not-notable, and should still be deleted.  --rob 13:37, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete stub about 19th century Senator's wife. No indications that she was notable in her own right. Capitalistroadster 19:07, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability is not usually conferred by a wedding ring. -Splash 22:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment the current page is completely different from the teen vanity/attack page that was first written. People with more experience can tell me if this is a trick to try to get it through vfd and the restore the attack page--Porturology 01:00, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry I just realised what happened. Deletethe current page--Porturology 01:04, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. --DrTorstenHenning 08:17, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.