Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Clendening


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 02:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Anna Clendening

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSICBIO ToT89 (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep has not released a great deal yet but does have significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as this independent biography at AllMusic here and an article in Bust (magazine) already in the article so passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 20:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete “Allmusic” is not a reliable source at all and the subject simply doesn’t meet notability for a musician. One article certainly isn’t enough. Trillfendi (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Allmusic is a long established reliable source. --Michig (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. Subject is notable. Lubbad85 (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Very weak Keep - I'm pretty much 50/50 - On one hand IMHO this is TOOSOON however on the other there are sources out there (ie ) - The majority of the sources on Google News aren't great however IMHO by a bare minimum notability is certainly there. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep — I've struggled with my decision while performing WP:BEFORE of this subject. Nearly everything that I read about this person positions my mind in the middle of the road. After two hours of research, I can't make a strong case to delete. I also can't make a strong case to keep. The subject has recently released her first EP, she's worked with two major labels (East West Records/Warner & Asylum). One of the music videos has 40 million views. She's embarking on her first tour, in some benchmark venues (capacity > 250). I know that these aren't the yardsticks that we favor here at Wikipedia, but in the music industry, these are some of the barometers that are watched. Considering that notability isn't always black & white, and that this subject is trending upwards, I've arrived at a KEEP. — Scottyoak2 (talk) 04:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm pretty much aligned with Scottyoak2's thinking; this subject hovers in the middle between keep and delete, but I lean keep in favor of interpreting the sum total of sources/indicators for real world notability that might fall outside a strict interpretation of wiki criteria. ShelbyMarion (talk) 01:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Probably delete. I'm searching, but the sources are marginal. I s there ANY WP:SIGCOV of her?E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.