Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Depenbusch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn. (non-admin closure) &mdash; neuro  (talk)  00:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Anna Depenbusch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO by not having at least two albums. No reliable sources in English provided.. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Withdrawn - taking your collective word for it that notability is established in the non-English sources. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 15:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Number of albums is only one of many criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, and two reliable sources are provided in German. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Yes, and that would be 1 of the 12 criteria of WP:Music, WP:MUSIC is another, which she passes for the references, which were already in the article before it was nominated. Non-English sources is not a valid reason for deletion.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Esradekan. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - article was properly sourced with two references prior to the nomination, and one of those references is actually a very long newspaper piece where the Depenbusch is the primary subject. -- Whpq (talk) 14:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.