Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Faith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep per Atlantic, compelling coverage in very reliable sources that has sustained across multiple years. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 03:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Anna Faith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article's subject fail to meet the relevant notability guidelines Rvivek25 (talk) 02:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep has reliable sources coverage in many good sources such as Time Magazine, ABC, New York Daily News, Playboy Fox News and others so therefore WP:BASIC is passed and the article should not be deleted. Also the circumstances of this nomination are suspect as the article has been the subject of persistent abusive vandalism over the last few days which resulted in page protection, Just before the page protection kicked in the article was nominated for AFD by an account that has been dormant since July 2018, so starting an spi, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with . has only 57 entries, so wikipedia is not being overrun with this type of activity, and this person seems to be in the top several dozen examples of the type. Twopower332.1938 (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. We are, strangely enough, living in a world where people become notable due to social media. Reliable sources are used. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.