Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Grabka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, since it has been wikified and reviews provided that demonstrate notability.  AK Radecki  19:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Anna Grabka

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable as per WP:BIO. No independent sources. —Visor (talk · contribs) 21:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC) *Comment currently there are twelve soloists with the Hamburg Ballet.Bigdaddy1981 23:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Definite Keep per below. Bigdaddy1981 21:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, principal soloist is a position there might be several at any given ballet (i.e. it doesn't mean THE principal soloist), but it seems like she's had a fairly strong career. Most of the search results I found are in Polish, though. --Dhartung | Talk 22:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is now cleaned up, sourced (reviews in New York Times, the U.S. 'Dance Magazine' etc) and wikified. She's danced as a soloist with a host of major ballet companies - English National Ballet etc - and if she was an actress, rather than a ballerina there'd be no question about her notability.  She has 40,500 ghits and if many of them are in Polish that's because she's, you know, from Poland. Nick mallory 02:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions.   --   &rArr; bsnowball  10:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - that NYT review just made my heart sink, especially that part about war's soldiers songs. What else is new? greg park avenue 01:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Elinks are not proper references, per WP:BLP we bios of living people should be better referenced to avoid any possible hoaxes.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Weak delete. Self-promotion, perhaps. Picus viridis 00:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.