Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Johns

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

2 anonymous votes ignored, 1 troll vote ignored and the first two comments (including the nomination) were very ambiguous. Rossami (talk) 04:12, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Anna Johns
Vanity? Almost 600 hits on google, most of which are relevant. GRider\talk 00:06, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I really don't know what that is. Like I said on that article's talk page, an article can't be nominated to be a featured article if it has a tag on it. All I know is that someone listed it at Category:Wikipedians with article.--Kaonashi 00:17, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, there are heaps of local media personalities in wikipedia --nixie 02:44, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, just under the bar of notability for me. Megan1967 04:00, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, self-promotion. Wyss 19:21, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Johntex 21:28, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, as interesting as Ann Curry's page i suppose. Hangry 06:28, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Why is this in Category:Wikipedians with article? It seems to be the work of an anon. Whether this is under or over the bar of notability I'm not too sure, but it looks like an autobiography and I err on the side of deleting them. If you're notable, someone (who doesn't know you personally) will create an article on you one day. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 09:32, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Not self-promotion. 23:28, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * keep Yuckfoo 03:42, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.