Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Pauw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A few undisputed sources that were offered late in the discussion carry this to a keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Anna Pauw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is mostly about her father, with a good chunk of the text an exact match from the article about her father. An outside search brings up no WP:SIGCOV to prove WP:GNG.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Weak keep it looks like theres more here, the reason for notability may be hidden away at the end "His widow had been married to him for 22 years, and wrote a biography of him that was published in 1943, three years after her death.” The article needs cleanup but it also seems like a rough translation from various Afrikaans wiki pages so thats to be expected. I'd suggest a stay of execution but whether or not the subject will eventually meet WP:GNG appears to be up in the air. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I have no idea what the passage in Africaans says, but when the content on her father (which is in his article) is taken out there is very little left. Possibly selectively merge to her father as a final paragraph to that article.  I not we do not have one on her husband.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - This was created just 2 months ago and deserves time to develop. If it does not develop it can always be merged or redirected to Johannes Rath (missionary). ~Kvng (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect Redirect to her father's article and merge anything that's referenced in there. Google did not reveal any additional sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I have removed content that was about her father, not about her, and also the long quote. The para in Afrikaans was the original of the following para in English; I have deleted it, and corrected part of the translation (Anna survived her husband by 22 years, she was not married to him for 22 years). Now I will try to look for additional sources. Based on the contents here, I do not think that she would meet any WP:SNG, so it remains to be seen if she meets WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:45, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Given the time and place, the sources are adequate and her work is independent of that of the men in her life.  WP:ANYBIO is met.   Montanabw (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: two reliable non-English Afrikaans sources: * Krüger, prof. D.W. en Beyers, C.J. (hoofred.) Suid-Afrikaanse Biografiese Woordeboek Deel III. Kaapstad: Tafelberg-Uitgewers, 1977. Vermaak, Adinda. 2004. Kroniek van 'n kontrei. Die verhaal van die NG kerk Kuilsrivier. Kuilsrivier: NG Kerkraad, along with this one in English: * KlausDierks.com Biographies of Namibian Personalities That is three reliable sources, which due to the extensive time interval between the person and the source, are also third-party.Epiphyllumlover (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.