Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Prosser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Oregon USA. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Anna Prosser

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon USA. This does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. Legacypac (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 19:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per the Speedy keep criterion 1. This is Articles for deletion, not Articles for discussion. Please discuss the possibility of a redirect in the talk page instead. --TL22 (talk) 01:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , SK#1 allows proposed redirects in the nom—changed within the last year czar  12:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Appearently that is not good enough on these low traffic articles. So Delete to prevent restoring and create a redirect. Legacypac (talk) 03:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect if the destination article is revised to have short bios of the winners.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Meets WP:GNG as a Google search suggests. Also has notability in the video gaming world as a manager for pro team Evil Geniuses and as an advocate for women in gaming. Merger into the Miss Oregon article won't really do the article justice.--Prisencolin (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That is not in the article - says she is a facility manager for a company. I've yet to see a facility manager profiled. Legacypac (talk) 07:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Its not in the EG article for some reason, and its possible that she doesnt' hold that position or any paid staff role anymore asthe video cited is from a few years ago.--Prisencolin (talk) 08:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Also the facility she managed is just a house (see video which is a tour, you can see the kitchen, bedroom, cat's basket, impressive misters on the back deck that the facility manager does not know how to turn on etc. Legacypac (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect at this point. Almost no sources present in article, almost no content present, even less content present related to the things she's supposedly notable for. Most of the article's content are random factoids bout her personal life and education, something she's done well at, but we don't have an article for every valedictorian out there. I'd revise my opinion if someone rewrites the article with a bunch of reliable, third party sources, and noteworthy content, but as is, the article is currently pointless, and would be better off as a redirect. Sergecross73   msg me  13:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect but second option would be weak delete. The article fails our notability criteria but I'm fine IAR'ing here and supporting a redirect since this article doesn't justify a standalone article. If she didn't win the Oregon pageant we wouldn't even be having this discussion but I'll wait a couple days and see if the supporters involved pupporting her notability can furnish more evidence than what we have been given. Adwctam (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect for now at best as there may be as a better notable article as there could be, we can all wait for a future better notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.