Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Sarah Kugler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Anna Sarah Kugler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disputed PROD. Reason was "Many people are the First Something. That does not make them notable. No full notability is asserted and verifiec in reliable sources, which may be paper sources, naturally. Without this material the article may not remain here." Fiddle  Faddle  19:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Her work as a medical missionary is notable and leads to her being referenced in biographical compilations on the topic. Her books also seem to pass notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Inclusion in the Encyclopedia of American women and religion, Famous American Women, and The Westminster Handbook to Women in American Religious History would suggest that she meets WP:BASIC. Gobōnobō  + c 22:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as close paraphrase of copyrighted material. Bwrs (talk) 22:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep She is obviously notable. If the article is kept, I will undertake to do a rewrite, with additional references and no close paraphrasing. --MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep significant historical figure--but needs rewriting as suggested, and I certaint trust MelanieN for knowing how to do it correctly.  DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for that vote of confidence, DGG. That plus the encouraging trend at this discussion inspired me to go ahead and do the rewrite. Anyone who hasn't looked at it recently is encouraged to take another look. --MelanieN (talk) 20:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per entries in three biographical dictionaries. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Clearly a significant figure in Church History. A paraphrase (or summary) is not a breach of copyright.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.