Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna lieb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Anna lieb

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advert-toned bio for a non-notable model turned writer. Person fails WP:BIO. Reliable source coverage not found. Credits are minor. Disputed prod. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for mainly failing the WP:BIO guideline, specifically the part relevant to pornographic actors or models.  one brave  monkey  14:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Though I'm quite impressed that she has a MySpace page (with pictures, considered a spiritual oasis & with a large amount of traffic), I don't see the Facebook page that would tip the balance... or not. No evidence of notability, but lots of vague claims ("a major showing" (who called it major?), "Several features" (cites?), "was ranked #2 in popularity" (ranked by whom?), etc.) - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - could not find reliable independent sources to establish notability. You'd expect at least one Google News hit from someone who is supposed to be "one of the most popular models in the world". --Boffob (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--whoa, that's about as pushy and vague an advertisement as one will find on WP. I don't see any notability either (and couldn't resist adding a few fact-tags to the article). Drmies (talk) 21:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - as it stands right now, there's no coherent argument for notability on the page. I can see however a couple of bits which might be enough to make her notable, but someone'll have to do some research to properly develop it. The bits I see are her mainstream appearances:
 * 1) Part in Swedish soap "Vanner och Fiender" (how extensive a part? Cameo, or was it more than that?)
 * 2) Hostess for DestinationTV on ABC (again, how extensive?)
 * 3) Lead role in video "summer party" starring (Heather Caroline Playboy's Miss April 2002) and Jacy Andrews
 * 4) Winner of "Internet Model of the year" (who awarded this?)
 * Sadly, I'm too under-the-weather right now to do that research myself right now. Tabercil (talk) 03:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of notability. Tatarian (talk) 11:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No independent reliable source proves notability per WP:PORNBIO. Tosqueira (talk) 04:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.