Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-Claire Montessori School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Taguig City.  MBisanz  talk 10:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Anne-Claire Montessori School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject is of questionable notability. Anne-Claire Montessori(sic) School is a private school in the Philippines. The only results I found with a google search were in phonebook-style listings of schools, and in a few personal pages that listed it as being a school they attend or had previously attended. Riffraffselbow (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete Unverifiable. - Mgm|(talk) 11:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources available to verify. ←  Spidern  →  18:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NHS. All high schools are notable. Information about this high school can be sourced by the school's entry on the Department of Education of the Philippines's website. Cunard (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There are not enough (if any?) secondary sources covering this school. The link you provided is a personal essay written last December, rather than an official policy or guideline. I do not believe that this school is notable. ←  Spidern  →  04:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Cunard (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  —Cunard (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant high school. I am about to clean it up and add sources for verification. Filipino schools have a negligible internet presence in English and local sources should be sought since we must avoid systemic bias. TerriersFan (talk) 23:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject's notability has been confirmed. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * When and where was the school's notability established? There are still only 11 Google search results for this school outside of Wikipedia. Am I missing something here? ←  Spidern  →  04:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources are only from the site of the school. The name of the school can be placed in an article of list of schools in that particular place. DinajGao (talk) 12:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Valley2 city ‽ 19:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

standards]]. It's not a public school, so I'd like to verify its notability with better sources. I can always do original research and ask my Filipino boyfriend for his opinion. This may be the first time I'll advocate for deletion of a "high" school article. Bearian (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as apparently non-notable, via the lack of reliable sources. Keeping an article just because it's not from the English speaking world, without respect to its lack of notability, is not the way to counter systemic bias. Sources don't even have to be in English to be reliable, but none seem to exist regardless. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: It does not appear a "high" school per Notability (high schools), only having six grades in the lower classes and one year in the upper level, so that essay does not apply in such cases. It also does not meet [[User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_High_Schools_at_WP:AfD|my fairly lax
 * Comment: Since the consensus here is leaning towards delete, I would advocate a merge/redirect to Taguig City instead of an outright delete, so that information about this educational institution will not disappear from Wikipedia. Cunard (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no reason to alter the presumption for high schools that sources are findable. DGG (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Presumption alone is not enough. Efforts have been made and it was determined that all the coverage there is lacks independence. If you can do better, place show it. - Mgm|(talk) 10:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.