Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-sophie bertrand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Anne-sophie bertrand

 * — (View AfD)

Neutral bump up from speedy. There's enough here to assert notability, and I found these two things  linked from her website. This article would take a bit of work to format and NPOV-ify. No opinion just yet. Kchase T 11:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ugh. Delete the article as it stands is garbage.  I wouldn't object to changing my vote given a total rewrite. Danny Lilithborne 12:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete She won some awards and played some possibly notable recitals, but I don't think that makes her notable. Terribly written and POV and, quite possibly, a conflict of interest (User:ANNE BERTRAND). Wavy G 15:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsalvageable, would need a total rewrite. As it stands, WP:BIO doesn't seem to be met, per Wavy G, and it's rife with WP:COI issues as well. -- Kinu t /c  17:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless rewritten. At the moment it appears to be just a cut-and-paste of the performer's stock bio. -- Bpmullins | Talk 21:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Conflict of interest and weak assertion of notability. —ShadowHalo 21:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but notable enough if rewritten without CoI issues. Doesn't meet WP:PROF, but should pass the woefully inclusive WP:MUSIC. As regards WP:BIO, I have a recollection of seeing an interview with her in La Libre Belgique some years ago, but I didn't find it. Worth a check on Factiva perhaps. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ugh.  Reads like a badly-retyped version of a bio as would appear in a concert programme. Subject is borderline notable but article is beyond repair in its current form. Raymond Arritt 22:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.