Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Fausto-Sterling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure)  Jay Jay What did I do? 00:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Anne Fausto-Sterling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:PROF Buzz47 (talk) 16:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC) — Buzz47 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep. She's the Nancy Duke Lewis Professor of Biology and Gender Studies: criterion #5 of WP:ACADEMIC. She'd also qualify under criterion #1 (her work is highly cited and influential), #2 (recipient of numerous awards), and #3 (she's a fellow of the AAAS). Alexrexpvt (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Alexrexpvt -- holder of a named chair, meets WP:ACADEMIC. -- BenTels (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the above; subject clearly meets WP:ACADEMIC. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above, flies over GNG. Insomesia (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Cites in GS enough to pass WP:Prof, even in pop-biology. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC).
 * Keep. Along with the multiple criteria of WP:PROF cited above, I found over 100 hits for her in highbeam, including many detailed reviews of her book Sexing the body, most in the popular press (I added three to the article). So I think she also passes WP:AUTHOR #4 and WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I note that this AfD nomination was the red-link nominator's first ever edit on Wikipedia. Is this a bad-faith nomination? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC).
 * Kinda wish I had noticed that. Just another sign that the SNOW is falling. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly meets WP:ACADEMIC. Possible bad-faith/vandalism nom. Jokestress (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.