Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Harper Charity Hudley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Anne Harper Charity Hudley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable biography. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for biographies. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  20:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looking at her CV I couldn't see any obvious reason that she should pass WP:PROF, but I will reconsider if anyone can prove she is highly cited based on citation indexes, etc. (I don't have access to these myself.) —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 06:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * FWIW, Charity Hudley has no publications listed in Web of Science and therefore no h-index, but WoS tends to under-represent linguists, especially applied linguists. Google Scholar shows fewer than 10 citations for each of the dozen or so publication it lists, but again some of her publications seem to be missing. Cnilep (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. 1 book and only 5 total citations on GS (don't see anything in WoS) – pretty average for an associate professor. She has an enormous CV (25 pages) and the best shot at WP:PROF I see there are only some local awards, e.g. "William and Mary Alumni Association Alumni Fellowship Award". FYI: An article on this same person was speedy-deleted some time ago (although traces seem to have been scrubbed). Uncontroversial delete. Thx, Agricola44 (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC).
 * FYI wiff of promotional WP:COI. This article was created by the WP:SPA account Eachsky, who has besides only edited/created the article on Hudley's coauthor of her book, Christine Mallinson, and added these two people to List of linguists. The speedied old version was created by Profch (record scrubbed but trace can be seen here) and there were COI concerns then, as well. The Mallinson article should probably be examined too. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete Put simply, not yet. She probably at the rate she is going will be notable in the future, but does not really meet our usual level at this point. Whether our usual level is the right level for inclusion is another question, but there is a virtue in consistency.  DGG ( talk ) 08:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.