Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne de Chantraine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no consensus to delete this article. (non-admin closure) ——  Serial # 12:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Anne de Chantraine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable WP:SOURCES seem to exist for this person. The article is lengthy and full of detail, yes, but the sources are AOL and Angelfire user pages, other broken links, and other unreliable sources. I have googled around and found pages that cite this Wikipedia article as their source. I have also found pages with significant blocks of text that match this page, suggesting potential copyvio, but I cannot trace the original source of those blocks of text and suspect they could be in the public domain. In any case, this does not seem like it belongs on Wikipedia unless someone else can locate some reliable sources here. Paradox society  22:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Paradox  society  22:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Comment There are some academic sources on this but it is not clear if it was a real or a fictitious character Lainx (talk) 05:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * According to this source this was a real person used as the basis for a character in one of Françoise Mallet-Joris's novellas. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, as she seems notable per the academic sources linked above (as well as being a character in a videogame) but perhaps strip back to version of 19 September 2017, at which point the article was more similar to the French and Spanish versions before the importation of large amounts of copoyvio word-for-word translation of text from "Livres Mystiques". Excessive detail.  Pam  D  11:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The person may be notable but the article does not follow WP style; instead it seems to be verbatim copies of some texts that are not referenced. It would need to be completely re-written. Lamona (talk) 06:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.