Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette Breaux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per WP:SNOW. This nomination has been listed over two weeks, with nobody to the rescue. A few Google searches finds zero reliable sources about this person. Her books are selling for less than $3 on eBay, hardly an endorsement of notability. Bearian (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Annette Breaux

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable author. Unable to substantiate grandiose claims or identify any significant coverage of the subject or the subject's writing in independent reliable sources. Bongo  matic  11:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment, I searched through umpteen pages of google, and couldnt find any independent sources except for the same authors blurbs from book jackets and pitches for seminars. There should at least be local newspaper coverage of the FIRST program, etc. if someone locally could be found to look for it.  He  iro  04:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment-if no one can even be bothered to comment on it, or the author bother to fix issues mentioned by the nom, why should it be relisted again? Why not just delete? The article was created by an SPA whose contribs 5 out of 7 were about this person.  He  iro  00:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP, lack of reliable sources. Peter Karlsen (talk) 01:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Peter Karlsen. --  role player 20:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.