Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette Freyberg-Inan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Annette Freyberg-Inan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not really seeing the independent sources on this one. I'm seeing two of the subject's homepages, two pages that don't mention her at all , three passing mentions by fora with which she is affiliated , four pages from vendors hawking her books and three of her articles. So, as far as WP:PROF is concerned, criterion 1 isn't met, and neither are any of the other criteria, as far as I can tell. - Biruitorul Talk 20:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  21:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Both pages you say don't mention her at at all, do in fact mention Annette Freyberg-Inan. Please, check more carefully before proposing a deletion. Check the editors list for the Journal of International Relations and Development http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jird/about.html#Editors and also the staff, research affiliate for the Political Economy and Transnational Governance (PETGOV) http://aissr.uva.nl/research/programme-groups/content/political-economy-and-transnational-governance/staff/research-affiliate/research-affiliate.html Also the subject's homepage are hosted by institutions: University of Amsterdam and University of Edinburgh. The fora to which she is affiliated are highly regarded in the field of IR/ International Relations. Three 'vendors of her books" happen to be some of the most distinguished university press institutions: Cambridge University Press, the John Hopkins University Press, State University of New York/SUNY Press. Articles are published in peer-refereed journals, once again, a guarantee of their quality by the wider academic community.

So, I do believe the reasons for "deletion" are unfounded.--Doinacaj (talk) 05:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Doinacaj. The sources you mention are everything that any normal academic or author would have. A CV on her employers website, articles she has written. Unfortunately normal academics don't get a page on wikipedia - only notable academics. None of these are articles about her by reliable sources which are independent of her. Have a look at WP:PROF. This gives a pretty clear idea of the Wikipedia requirements for us to keep an article. Please address these requirements and explain why this academic meets those requirements or else this article will be deleted. My understanding of those requirements is that homepages don't satisfy those requirements nor do contributions to notable fora nor do peer referenced articles so I'm afraid that your paragraph above will not help convince us to keep this article (Though, if you do find enough independent coverage to satisfy WP:PROF, then those links will all be useful for making the article better).
 * Sorry if this is not what you want to here but those are the requirements we apply to other academics and we will apply them to this article too. filceolaire (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC) *Keep Her books are given serious reviews in academic journals, that along carries her past WP:AUTHOR. Even a regular google on book title + name shows the reviews.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Doinacaj, I don't know what you see when you look at the two pages listed above as not including information about her, but I, too, get nothing about her on those pages. This could be a search engine geo-loc difference. I also note that 1) you are the creator of this page and 2) this is the only article you have worked on here at WP. Clearly, you have a stake in this article, and I'm sorry that this is not a more positive experience. However, there are policies that must be considered. You might want to spend some time editing articles of interest as you become more familiar with the WP culture. Creating a new article is one of the hardest things you can do here. LaMona (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * - could you list a few of those reviews? Thanks. I found books and articles by her but not about her or her books. LaMona (talk) 15:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Searches on her name need to be done carefully, what look at first blush like reviews and citation, turned out to be mere book notices on journal website, and that fact that the book is part of a SUNY Press series, making it appear at first blush that she is being widely cited in other academic books on the topic that turn out, in fact, merely to list all titles in the series.
 * On close examination, I find very little evidence of influence as a scholar, or of production of impactgful work, merely, she publishes and co-authors a lot.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches show only passing mentions, not the significant coverage needed to establish notability.  Onel 5969  TT me
 * Delete -- my searches came up dry. Her Google scholar h-index is 9. Article in present shape is really mostly a CV or resume, like, it does not say what she is notable for doing.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.