Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette Schwarz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  09:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Annette Schwarz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only possible RS is Bild that is a tabloid and known to take cavalier attitude to truth to drive up readership RSN discussion. Otherwise just porn ecosystem non news. Fails Gng and Ent is is not sourced to the required level for a blp. Spartaz Humbug! 22:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the Bild piece is trivial and the trade sources are not considered reliable sources due to their close relationship with the porn industry, wordpress blogs are mainly unreliable and i haven't found any decent coverage in reliable sources so WP:GNG is not passed in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 06:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:BASIC; typical industry blotter and non-RS entries. Not much to go on here; BLPs require better than this. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The usual porn biz unusable-for-notability sites, plus a pdf of an interview hosted on a wordpress blog. That is certainly novel. And useless. Zaathras (talk) 01:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.