Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annex Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Annex Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Appears to be written by the organization / person themself. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete regardless of who wrote it, this fails WP:GNG and is nowhere close to the point of passing it. The article describes it as some kind of experimental art project rather than an actual publishing house, but that does not help. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC) — Striking per WP: SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Prince of Thieves (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete without prejudice if someone can find the references to recreate in the future. I can't find much of anything on the open web, or in One Search, but looking at the list of poets and artists the press has worked with, I think it is likely that this press is actually historically important. But the references aren't there at present. I would push back on the idea that this is an art project, rather than a press. For the poets and artists of the 70s those lines were exceedingly blurry. I do think the article on Kabza is not as viable as this one; if this one sticks or is recreated later, we can have a few sentences about him here. --Theredproject (talk) 18:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete Checked other wiki articles on small presses of period. Subject of this article publishes many same authors as This magazine, which appears to be defunct, and had published fewer books / magazines. Jenbenamoud (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC) — Jenbenamoud (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * My standard response to that is to make lists and delete them. You need to show how it meets the guidelines, not look at other sub-standard articles. Prince of Thieves (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC) — Striking per WP: SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)


 * delete big pile of conflicted, promotional editing for this page as well as Julian Kabza, clearly wanting to use WP to gain visibility for a subject who fails WP:BIO criteria and his associated company which fails NCORP. Jytdog (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources in the article are not WP:RS evidence of WP:NOTABILITY. A search turned up nothing else which might be. Narky Blert (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.