Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie B. Bond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Annie B. Bond

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:GNG cant find any secondary sources to back up this WP:BLP BigDunc  11:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —  BigDunc  11:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with the nominator here. Delete in the absence of reliable secondary sources. Crafty (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - A rewrite of the article is necessary. However I believe Ms. Bond has received enough independent - 3rd party - creditable - verifiable coverage from sources as the Washington Post - St. Louis Post-Dispatch - Pittsburgh Post Gazette  and Seattle Times as shown here  to warrant inclusion here at Wikipedia.  Thanks ShoesssS Talk 15:13, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per my prod (which was removed).— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  22:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. -Falcon8765 (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, she is mentioned in most of the above sources, but most are just brief mentions of or very short reviews of her books (in fact, all but one fall into that category, as far as I can see). The only longer mention is in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, in which she is interviewed as teh author of books on green cleaning - not all that substantial. I don't see how she meets WP:BIO, or WP:CREATIVE based on these references. So I say delete, though it's not as clear-cut as some I've seen. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 17:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.