Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Crawley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 00:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Annie Crawley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources that established the subject notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC) Keep. Nomination withdrawn. It has been demonstrated that she passes GNG. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 09:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Concur on GNG failure and Women Diver's Hall of Fame is not sufficient for any of the specific guidelines. Agricola44 (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC).
 * Keep Does no one have access to databases? The Santa Barbara Independent calls her " Now one of America’s leading ocean-environment educators." Her work is reviewed in School Library Journal more than once. She's a children's educator and she passes GNG. The article needs work, but that's no reason to delete. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, I feel a spinout coming on, having found the following reviews for the book Plastic Ahoy!, which she illustrated (by photographs): - American Scientist,  - Maine State Library,  - SportDiver,  - Kirkus Reviews,  - School Library Journal and Booklist,   - won a Green Earth Book Award. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Megalibrarygirl Should this be userfied? It's so difficult getting an article going after it's been hit with an AfD. --MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 20:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 14:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment while I think she passes GNG, I'd rather the article be user fire than deleted, . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree that this passes GNG, it's the inane deadline that occurs once it hits AfD that messes with a lot of articles that gets them deleted when they should not be deleted at all. And then it becomes even more difficult getting them back! Some individuals just don't have 24 hours every single day to work on fixing every worthwhile article that comes up on AfD. Also, I agree with you, that this checking for notability only through the internet is just plain silly, but then I've always find libraries to be the most brilliant of places! --MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 20:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Move to Draft space (or user space) - I have confidence that something notable could be dug up about her. Ceosad (talk) 18:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep It has been demonstrated that she passes GNG, no reason to remove the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep In rereading everything, I believe a "keep" is the best idea here since it does appear to pass GNG to multiple individuals and I ultimately question what actually happens to an article that gets userfied. Seems likely that the odds of those articles coming back diminishes greatly. --MurderByDeadcopy</i><i style="color:black;">"bang!"</i> 19:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, I agree that the time crunch is frustrating. I'm also frustrated that this article is still up for deletion. Her work is reviewed by RS, she is covered in multiple sources, therefore, she passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.