Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Rhiannon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Annie Rhiannon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Blogger. Possible claims to fame: nominated for 2007 Irish Blog Awards, "coined" two words I have never heard of, and developing a website called Facebonk which sounds like a joke. No reliable sources are given as references (there's a Guardian link, but it's a section of their website where users can submit their own reviews of her blog). Google search gets lots of hits, but they all seem to be from the article subject herself posting on forums and blogs and such. Since May, the article's been prodded twice (first time by me) and had the notability tag placed and removed and replaced--the article's creator seems to be the only editor defending the article (his comment when removing last prod: "bloggers who enjoy larger readerships than many authors should tend to be included on what is, after all, a web based entity such as wikipedia"), so I'm bringing it to AFD for an outside decision. Propaniac 14:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Whilst the subject obviously spends an impressive amount of time pervading the internet the article still fails to assert notability, particularly in terms of WP:BIO. The claims that are made fall quite short of WP:V, also. That would make my vote one of Delete. OBM | blah blah blah 15:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article gives no proof of notability and I can't find any proof either. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 15:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass WP:BIO -- su mn ji m  talk with me·changes 16:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:BIO, WP:V, and WP:NOTE. Ariel ♥ Gold 17:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.