Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annotated Bibliography: The Future of International Accounting Standards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  02:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Annotated Bibliography: The Future of International Accounting Standards

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A pure original research-y essay on accounting standards. (The author thoughtfully notes that this topic was picked in conjuction with his honors thesis). Maybe a good paper, but not for an encyclopedia. B figura (talk) 03:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC). I am also nominating the following related page as it appears to simply be a duplicate of the essay:

Like the various other "An Annotated Bibliography" essays, these are apparently dumps from a University of Florida course. (cf. "About the author" at the end of this article). -- Fullstop (talk) 19:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC) ps: not likely a multiple offender, but apparently all SPA accounts of students of the same course.
 * Delete as nom, for the reasons above. B figura  (talk) 04:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely original research, not worthy of an encyclopedia entry. The author should write a book instead. Parkerjl (talk) 05:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Please publish elsewhere. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It's an essay. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 12:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Berig (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a WP:NOT multiple offender. There's no obligation to keep this in any form, the author should have known better. WillOakland (talk) 02:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to user space. Like the other "An Annotated Bibliography" essays, these are personal notes. The editor is however apparently familiar with the subjects at hand, and should thus be encouraged to integrate the information from those essays into the appropriate articles. -- Fullstop (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.