Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annotated Bibliography for Impact of Digital Music and File-Sharing on Traditional Music Industry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Annotated Bibliography for Impact of Digital Music and File-Sharing on Traditional Music Industry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a personal essay violating WP:NOR. Commentary on the sources is also Original Research, and the result has the nature of being a directory. dramatic (talk) 01:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as essay. JJL (talk) 01:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Not a great essay, either Rotovia (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic, POV, OR, etc. WP:NOT per suspicions of this being a University of Florida class assignment per ANI discussion. --Dhartung | Talk 03:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as an essay, as well as per Dhartung immediately above. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 06:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another "annotated bibliography". JuJube (talk) 06:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Like the various other "An Annotated Bibliography" essays, these are apparently dumps from a University of Florida course. (cf. "About the author" at the end of this article). -- Fullstop (talk) 19:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC) ps: not likely a multiple offender, but apparently all SPA accounts of students of the same course.
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is not what Wikipedia's for.-- Beloved Freak  10:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete original research --Pustefix (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to user space. Like the other "An Annotated Bibliography" articles, these are personal notes. The editor is however apparently familiar with the subjects at hand, and should thus be encouraged to integrate the information from those essays into the appropriate articles. -- Fullstop (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As i've mentioned before this is likely (now confirmed due to the similar email contacts in the about the author sections) to be a school project which uses Wikipedia as their personal webspace. Wikipedia is no place for personal essays. Please use Blogger or Wordpress or LiveJournal instead next time, guys Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 20:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't say what hasn't already been said.  RC-0722 247.5/ 1  22:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, yet another WP:NOT multiple offender. (multiple, not repeat). WillOakland (talk) 00:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per RC-0722. victor falk 16:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.