Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anntonia Porsild


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Anntonia Porsild

 * –( ViewAfD Viewlog  Stats )

Non-notable subject/individual, as well as very limited sources (mostly non-reliable and/or primary sources). The contest in which the individual won, Miss Supranational, is also considered a non-notable beauty pageant competition on Wikipedia, as evidenced by the lack of an article entry on said contest and any related articles, on English Wikipedia. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 01:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —C.Fred (talk) 01:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. —C.Fred (talk) 01:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Just noting for now that the community found Miss Supranational non-notable in Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination). ☆ Bri (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per consensus that Miss Supranational is non-notable. I believe the pageant community here should be very proactive about these non-notable articles being created so often, as it's a major problem. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 01:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The sole point apparently asserted for notability is one that does not provide it, and the subject is not well-sourced to reliable sources. BD2412  T 05:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete if the competition is not notable than winning it does not make one notable. The reverse is not neccesarily true.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST Atlantic306 (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Naturally, her winning the title has generated plenty of media coverage, and she has appeared on TV talk shows like this one. I'm not sure whether they're in-depth enough to satisfy GNG though. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.