Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable; Apparently self-published book; Various attempts to add the book into Wikipedia Wxidea (talk) 06:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

This book, Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne, has the following reference at Library and Archives Canada:

AMICUS No. 39134670 Serial NLC COPIES: NLC Electronic - TITLE(S): Annuaire de la noblesse moderne des maisons principales de l'Europe (En ligne) *Annuaire de la noblesse moderne des maisons principales de l'Europe [ressource électronique] PUBLISHER: Montréal : Kozma Petrovitch Prutkov. DESCRIPTION: Paraît depuis 2010? FREQUENCY: Annuel E-LOCATIONS: http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/101/201/300/annuaire_noblesse/ index.html Pour les fonds voir la Collection électronique de BAC. NOTES: Accès restreint aux clients de BAC sur place seulement. Type of computer file: Publication en série électronique en format PDF. NUMBERS: Canadiana: 20113008627 ISSN: 1925-5594 CONSER: ocn733231825

The articles was added by user Rapportroyal two months after adding a number of borderline citations.

The publisher is listed as "Montréal : Kozma Petrovitch Prutkov" -- which appears to be a bogus or self-published publisher. You can search for the book here:

Note, it's possible that citations to this book should also be removed from Wikipedia.

While I am sure the author is sincere, this book appears to fail notability tests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wxidea (talk • contribs) 06:38, July 9, 2011
 * Delete. I can't find any references to establish notability. No library other than Library and Archives Canada (formerly the National Library of Canada) seems to have a copy. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable, per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 00:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Disavian, I've seen "per nom" written various places in Wikipedia discussions. What does it mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wxidea (talk • contribs) 03:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * per nom = for the same reasons as those cited by the nominator Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * AH, "nom"="nominator"... thanks. Wxidea (talk) 13:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I am undable to find independent reliable sources that would indicate notability. Considering this work is not referenced at all on Gbooks & Gscholar, it does not appear to be a relaible source and I suggest removing it from articles where it is used to cite things. Edward321 (talk) 13:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Being absent from Gbooks and Gscholar could just indicate that it is a very recent publication. The publisher's name, Kozma Petrovitch Prutkov, makes me very suspicious, though. See also this article's talk page. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.