Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annubis (fictional planet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Humanx Commonwealth. A merge, effectively, but since there's nothing to merge that's not already there, what's the point? Black Kite 12:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Annubis (fictional planet)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable fictional planet. Article lacks references as well. A fictional planet, country, city, location etc. is something very common in... fiction. This doesn't imply that all are notable. Magioladitis (talk) 09:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 12:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 12:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 12:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fictional planet with fictional notability. Wikipedia is not a fansite. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Humanx Commonwealth, lacks notability to justify a stand alone article RadioFan (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge - As RadioFan puts it. I'd gander that most of the articles linked here List of Humanx Commonwealth planets would not stand up to scrutiny at AfD resulting in redirects or deletions -- Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 14:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment remaining similar articles nominated at Articles for deletion/List of Humanx Commonwealth planets--RadioFan (talk) 14:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Lacks notability on its own, but would be fine in expository context of the aforementioned list. --Cybercobra (talk) 16:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * What exactly to merge? Can you please tell me one prhase of this article that we should put in the other as is? -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge nothing — anyone actually look? damn near the same drivel is already there (*both* theres). Sheesh. Jack Merridew 06:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * &hellip; which makes step #2 of the merger process a very easy one. It does not magically change a merger into a deletion.  Uncle G (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing to merge anywhere. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 20:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.