Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anoop Krishnan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Anoop Krishnan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is a non notable actor & doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR either. I should also say that subject has won a non notable award. Subject also lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: I believe there are sufficient roles for WP:NACTOR. There is also significant coverage, although the main issue is whether the sources are reliable. While there are many Times of India articles online, which are not necessarily reliable, there are also some other sources from The Hindu and Deccan Chronicle—two sources are already provided in the article—so I think WP:GNG is met, too. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep A couple of notable credits, at least, and enough coverage (I read Deccan and the Hindu; Hindu is good, Deccan is okay-ish) that we should err on the side of keeping, considering there are the TOI, and very likely other Hindi and Malayalam language sources to supplement with. Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I believe there are sufficient roles for WP:NACTOR as at least in the Malayalam language film industry. Abstrakt (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.