Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Day (short film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn as article merged -- Samir  धर्म 12:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Another Day (short film)
A short film produced by students in Nottingham with no IMDB citation and no substantial claim to notability beyond local press coverage -- Samir  धर्म 00:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn, I agree with merge -- Samir  धर्म 12:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge info to Chilwell School and redirect. If need be, I'll do the work, just let me know. Akradecki 01:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Akradecki. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without merge, non-notable film, and adding trivial information about extra-curricular student projects to school pages is a bad precedent... -- Kinu t /c  05:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge Should be merged into Chilwell School. *~Daniel~* ☎ 05:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Considering the fact that the project was among the first, and without doubt the most successful, of its kind, perhaps creating a page for the project itself, separate from the Chilwell School page would be a possibility? The project was significant to education and the teaching of media in particular. If not, I am happy for the page to be merged with Chilwell School. Tom 10:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Chilwell School. It's unreferenced and mainly a local story. If it gets nominated for a notable award, then it can come back into its own article. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  15:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I am perfectly happy for the article to be merged into Chilwell School and redirected, as Akradecki suggested. (I do, however, strongly disagree with Kinu as the extra-curricular project was far from "trivial"). If the film does well at the forthcoming "Bang" short film festival, then I assume it could come back to its own article? Akradecki, if your offer to carry out the work still stands, that would be great. Tom 16:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * DELETE There is no point in merging. Take your pick of WP:NOT violations. Verifiable by Reliable, Independent, Third-Party Publications and sources beyond local press coverage?  Has it achieved any awards? -- Brian  ( How am I doing? ) 17:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge —  per Akradecki American Patriot 1776 18:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Akradecki — It's agreed! Tom 18:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - text (with a little cleanup), has now been merged over to the Chilwell article. All that remains is to blank the text here and add a redirect tag. Didn't want to do that until the AfD was closed. Is there an admin in the house who can speedy keep the article so a redirect can be made? Akradecki 22:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * note: doesn't need admin. I've just redirected the page for the time being, but I'll put it up for RfD. Ohconfucius 13:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment don't bother with the RfD, let this AfD close and the closing admin will delete the redirect -- Samir  धर्म 13:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.