Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Digance Indulgence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Another Digance Indulgence

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously in October 2008. Eight half-hour episodes in 1987. Starred red-linked actor. Being broadcast on the BBC Radio 2 is not sufficient for notability. StarM 00:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  --  StarM  00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  --  StarM  00:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The actor was redlinked because his surname was misspelled -- it has been corrected and he is notable. Being broadcast on a national radio network is notable. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Being broadcast on a national radio network is notable.  recent AfDs have said otherwise, especially this most recent one. Simply being broadcast on the BBC does not provide sufficient notability StarM  03:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I would think the other AfD's result is irrelevant to this discussion, as per WP:ALLORNOTHING. And for the sake of debate, why would a program broadcast on a national network with a notable entertainer as its star not be considered notable? Pastor Theo (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not binding but it's not irrelevant because it's relate don the same subject with the same arguments. It shows a pattern of recent AfDs and redlinks here and in the above-linked previous AfD]], which were subsequently re-nominated and deleted. All of which have closed as delete because there has been no evivdence of notability. Please also see WP:NOTINHERITED. Notability guidelines do not include being broadcast on the BBC because it's not sufficient when there are no sources. However we're now about to get hit with a flood of omg! I've heard of it. Notable notable notable despite there being no evidence of notability. So this one will close as no consensus. Sigh. So not productive. StarM  00:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - programme receives sufficient mention under Richard Digance. . . Rcawsey (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect The topic has too little information to support a separate article, but that doesn't warrant outright deletion. It is better to point readers to the mention in the Digance article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect - duplicate of info at Richard Digance pablo hablo. 14:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: article duplication/fork of Richard Digance. JamesBurns (talk) 01:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.