Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Hope (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 22:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Another Hope (second nomination)

 * 1st AfD.
 * Delete. Per Articles for deletion/Lori Jareo. &mdash; Mike (talk &bull; contribs) 14:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft without prejudice to recreation if a noteworthy legal stink ensues.  young  american  (ahoy-hoy) 15:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per MikeWazowski.  young  american  (ahoy-hoy) 12:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Novel was part of a national news story due to author's complete disregard of copyright. News mentions from National Public Radio, SciFi Wire, Publisher's Weekly, the Daytona Beach News-Journal, Comic Book Resources, Ansible, and blog mentions from professional authors here, here, here, and at StarWars.com. Easily meets WP:WEB and/or WP:BIO, take your pick. MikeWazowski 16:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete so this novel breaking the law makes it notable? --Pboyd04 16:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - based on the news coverage I cited, it seems some people think so... MikeWazowski 16:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong keep per MikeWazowski, and because this very definitively survived (6 keep, 2 weak keep, 2 delete) an AfD discussion 10 weeks ago. -- Kicking222 21:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The reasoning from the first AfD seem to show this is notable enough, as does MikeWazowski here. GassyGuy 23:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above and first AfD. TheRealFennShysa 14:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.