Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Side of Peace (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wizardman 16:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Another Side of Peace (film)

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Non-notable documentary. The film was never released to theaters, and was screened at a dozen or so film festivals (according to the film's website). This film is not even on IMDb's radar. Fails notability guidelines at WP:NFILMS. talk 12:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep: Schmidt is a genius. Joe Chill (talk) 21:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee //  have a cup  //  flagged revs now!  // 11:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep and send to WP:Cleanup for expansion and sourcing. With respects to the nominator, it seems that apart from festivals, the film has indeed been written about... and has had both theatrical and television release beginning in 2005 .  It was part of the 3rd National Conference of Brit Tzedek v'Shalom , is now part of curriculum at some universities , is making impact in conferences dealing with human rights , and heck... it even won some awards . Documentary films rarely get the press hype of media blockbusters, but guideline allows that they be may judged in context for what they are. Surmountable issues are no reason for deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of media coverage.  D r e a m Focus  01:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions.  — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy/Snow Keep. Per Schmidt.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.