Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anry Nemo, Blackeri, Bri-chan, Daniel Conway, Pu-sama, and Ssilence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no result, relisting individually upon requests. Melchoir 19:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Anry Nemo, Blackeri, Bri-chan, Daniel Conway, Pu-sama, and Ssilence
Non-notable artists. These are the remaining artist articles from Category:DeviantART whose notability is confined to similar websites, after Suzi9mm was deleted at Articles for deletion/Suzi9mm. None of the six makes any claim to notability beyond deviantART or occasionally GFXartist, and they are all built around deep external links. Wikipedia is not a website indexing service. Melchoir 01:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep with respect to Anry Nemo - he seems like a borderline notable artist outside DeviantART. 240 unique Google hits, 52 unique Google Images, and it looks likely that there is plenty more information on him in Russian.  Relist individually with respect to the others - I don't think these are clear-cut enough cases to give a blanket answer to all of them.  I will suggest, though, that we move and redirect each of these articles to the name, not the handle, of the artist.  --Hyperbole 04:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 240 isn't much for someone with an internet presence, and it pales in comparison to Suzi9mm, which went down without too much fuss. More importantly, I didn't see any reliable sources, and the Russian thing is interesting but doesn't help the verifiability problem that's a big part of non-notability. All that said, I will relist the individual articles as you ask: maybe not in the next few minutes, but I'll get around to it. I just didn't expect much opposition, and I wanted to save myself the work. Finally, if you want to err on the inclusionist side, we should keep the articles where they are, since their handles are much more popular than their real names. Melchoir 05:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Ssilence I know at least Ssilence is WELL known in the community. --Mboverload 08:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JimTS 14:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm an avid deviantART fan, but just a mere presence on DA doesn't by itself make anyone notable.  RGTraynor 15:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The articles have different levels of quality and do not deserved to be grouped together like this. Make the case per each article or don't make it at all. If the god that Naruto summons get their own wikipedia page I don't see why real people who have some level of internet fame don't deserve some recognition. --ReptileLawyer 15:52, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All Im a long term Deviant but if precedent has been set and additionally they fail notability tests then they should go. Tyhopho 17:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All Per nom--Zxcvbnm 18:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for voting, everyone, but I'm going to "close" this nomination so that I can relist the individuals at my leisure. Sorry for the trouble! Melchoir 19:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.