Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnswerX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. for now. I've dropped the article into the workspace of the creator, accessible at User_talk:BarryRGreene/Sandbox. Perhaps when it is refined and sourced properly, it can be moved to article space. Joyous! | Talk 00:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

AnswerX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject has minimal coverage in reliable sources and the page does not provide enough context explaining what the subject actually is. Meatsgains (talk) 23:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Article fails to meet notability. There are no sources in article to explain the relevance and impact of the subject. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  23:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:59, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete article has zero sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This article is work in progress. It would list out the the history of AnswerX, references, and software details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarryRGreene (talk • contribs) 15:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.