Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antônio de Orléans e Bragança


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Antônio de Orléans e Bragança

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person is not notable. This person is a minor member of an imperial house which was deposed some time ago. Notability is not inherited. PatGallacher (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yet there are several articles on books or newspaper citing him, used as sources for the article and many more to be added. If this isn't notability, I don't know what it is. Besides, as a member of a deposed royal house, it is matter of curiosity for many who may search on the subject, either monarchism or connections to other royalty, or Brazilian history, history of the Orléans-Braganza, etc. To suggest the article is irrelevant claiming lack of notability for being of a deposed royal house, it implies that we should exclude tons of articles on members of deposed and even reigning royal houses who aren't the monarchs, pretenders or heirs, and for what purpose? Cartoon Fantasy World (talk) 17:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a geneaological database. We do not keep articles just because someone is descended from people who help royal power.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete There isn't much here on the subject himself--just a blurb about his paintings. The other sources are difficult to examine as they are either PDFs in Portuguese or paper-only books. JoelleJay (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.