Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ant & Bee Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 21:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Ant & Bee Corporation
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional article about a non-notable corporation. Article is heavily copy & pasted from the company website. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi Wildthing, fear not faint hearted one. i'm coordinating 30 user's contributions to this article. We will be adding content in the next few days to conform to WP:CORP standards. we will also be modifying content that was copied from the company website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo32312 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Please keep in mind that this can be seen as a conflict of interest. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete' - the assertions made within the article aren't impressive and do not mark them out as having a big influence in their area of expertise (4th-largest supplier of HR to a state govt). Google news hits are restricted to a Credit report. No significant coverage, and no coverage at all independent of the subject. There's no evidence that the company's scope is even national, never mind international, and the lack of 3rd-party sources entirely buggers up the prospect of passing WP:CORP. Non-notable COI-fuelled entry. – Toon (talk)  00:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable company with no independent sources to establish. There is not even an assertion of notability and the anon-IP removal of the CSD is fishy to say the least...this should have been speedied. Cquan (after the beep...) 06:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.