Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antal Kerpely Dormitory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 06:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Antal Kerpely Dormitory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Entirely unremarkable building.TheLongTone (talk) 13:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Quite the contrary, Antal Kerpely Dormitory is much more significant than for example St. John's Lutheran College Girls Dormitory (built in 1950), Cabin Creek Ranger Residence and Dormitory (big wood-frame house) or Indian Dormitory (which has just about 20 rooms), and the three too late dormitory is not really prodigiously well written articles. We will keep it. --Boys of Chatting box (talk) 05:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Very interesting. I'd say that the above user is a newly created SPA, but they have also created three articles on moths, which share features with a demented editot who keeps creating new acounts, writing a couple of suck articles, & then I assume getting blocked as a loudly quacking sock.TheLongTone (talk) 13:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Absolute not intresting your are dealing with articles of moths, and not focusing about the Antal Kerpely Dormitory article. The Subdomain is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antal Kerpely Dormitory, your problem was "unremarkable", and I proved you are absolutly not true compare the Antal Kerpely Dormitory with a big wood-frame house in Sierra Nevada. --Auto1080p (talk) 16:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: No sources that I can see and doesn't appear to meet WP:GEOFEAT. Sorry, but this really doesn't look like it can be included here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. College hall of residence built in 1971. No notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ass the Boys of Chatting box wrote it down, we will keep it anyway, I mean anyway. Do you understand the word: "anyway"? It necessary to repeat, and repeat at 10AM. and 5PM again. St. John's Lutheran College Girls Dormitory built in 1950, College hall of residence built in 1971. the same. We won't accept Necrothesp hang of an argument. Necrothesp said nothing. The sources can be added later. --Auto1080p (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Although your English is execrable it sounds as though you're saying it will be kept no matter what anyone else's opinion may be. Wikipedia doesn't work like this. You clearly haven't realised that all the American buildings you mention are on the National Register of Historic Places, which qualifies them for inclusion. Is this building on a similar list? No? Then it doesn't qualify under the same convention. Buildings aren't just notable because they're there! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete run-of-the-mill building, no history (except being in existence), no indication why it is notable. Kraxler (talk) 01:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.