Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antec Kuhler H20 620


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. unsourced promotional content isn't appropriate for a merge and since the consensus is clearly that this isn't for mainspace... Spartaz Humbug! 12:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Antec Kuhler H20 620

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. Specific models of CPU coolers are generally not notable, only generating standard user reviews from computer sites. Moreover, this is nearly blatant advertisement (i.e. The Kuhler H20 620 is one of the Antec's budget water cooling solutions that should be enticing for those building budget gaming rigs.). If anything else, this needs to be completely rewritten, if notable, to be encyclopedic and neutral in tone. –MuZemike 02:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP is not a consumer buyers guide and WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep.As suggested,I have removed the sentences which looked like spam,removed specifications.I think the article is ready to be kept. That's me!   Have doubt?   Track me!  11:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciate removal of the sales talk, although if the article survives, I would prefer that the specs be restored. The underlying problem remains, however, that this product, as an individual product, is not of encyclopedic interest. Fails WP:GNG. Other than someone shopping for one right now, what is of interest to a WP reader that is not already covered in Computer cooling or CPU cooling? If the "Antec Kuhler H20 620" article did not already exist and had been replaced yesterday the "Antec Kuhler H20 621", I cannot imagine that anyone would even suggest adding an article for the old model. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought it was a joke at first, but apparently there is such a thing. Article still is not encyclopedic. At best merge into Antec article. W Nowicki (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Merge into Antec article. Individual accessory fails WP:GNG. --Kvng (talk) 18:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.