Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Brodeur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Martin Brodeur. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Anthony Brodeur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NHOCKEY as a seventh-round pick who has not had a substantial amateur award and who hasn't played sufficiently in either the NHL or another professional league. My own preference is redirect to Martin Brodeur (preserving the information in the history so that, in the future he does achieve notability on his own that a revert can easily occur), but I wanted to submit to a discussion because delete is certainly a possible alternative. --Nlu (talk) 16:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Martin Brodeur. Has no notability independent of his father. Resolute 19:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: due to failure of NHOCKEY; it's not as if anyone cares about any of the other late round draft picks. The only reason anyone cares about him is because of his father.   Ravenswing   00:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Martin Brodeur. Patken4 (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Martin Brodeur. This AfD is not necessary as the nom could/should have redirected this article, as it is his stated preference, per WP:BOLD. Dolovis (talk) 03:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.