Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony D. Galluccio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Carabinieri 17:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Anthony D. Galluccio

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced article about a city councilman from a mid-sized city running for another office, nn. Carlossuarez46 18:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. An ambition to be (very mildly) notable is not itself particularly notable. Jakew 21:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, although we can cover him if he wins a state legislative seat. --Dhartung | Talk 22:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, and has very limited context. —  Wen li  (contribs) 02:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- There are valid sources for this person:, , , etc. Over 30 thousand ghits.  That's notable--not famous, but notable.  The article needs cleanup, but there is no reason to delete. LeSnail 16:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Searching Google with the name "Anthony Galluccio" generates 682 ghits, the 30 thousand number includes all sorts of pages that have anyone named Anthony and another named Galluccio somewhere on the same page. As for the 3 sources you provide: only 1 might be considered a reliable source and it talks about his car crash - not a notable event. At most this guy is notable locally, like most city legislators from midsize places are. Carlossuarez46 23:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand per Lesnail's points or maybe merge it to the city's article when mentioned about politics.--JForget 23:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per Lesnail and JForget. Bearian 03:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Academic Challenger 02:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.