Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Falbo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Talk Islander 01:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Anthony Falbo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails general notability guideline because there are not multiple, independent sources that discuss this guy (despite what appears to be an active internet marketing campaign) and fails the notability guideline for creative professionals. Article history swings wildly from gushing fan praise to extremely critical text - it would be worth the BLP and NPOV nightmare if this guy met the article criteria, but he doesn't. Somno (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Here's an article that appears to be specifically about him and his style. To read its' contents one must pay for the article.  Minor painters don't get as much press coverage as say, minor musicians, because of the different ways they advertise, so one article goes a long way in demonstrating notability.  Themfromspace (talk) 02:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- There are not enough reliable secondary sources available on this artist to meet WP:NOTABILITY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwishiwazjohng (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. The NewsBank reference cited above appears to be an article in his local paper. I would to see more references than that before I could be convinced that we should have an article on him. Capitalistroadster (talk) 16:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:CREATIVE. THF (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.