Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Hanemaayer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Anthony Hanemaayer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Definitive fail of WP:BLP1E. This article was longer, with lots of details about a crime for which this person was convicted and then exonerated. Even in the longer version it would have been 1E. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PERP. The story that people want to know is with Paul Bernardo and this subject is briefly mentioned there with appropriate weight. A fork is not necessary. Location (talk) 14:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - per WP:BLP1E; WP:CRIME and WP:PERP etc. ukexpat (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Location's succinct reasoning above. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PERP--Chip123456 (talk) 18:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. BTW, it concerns me to see WP:PERP being cited, not because it doesn't apply in theory, but because the subject clearly wasn't the perpetrator; it seems like there needs to be something specific for those who are wrongly convicted. I think I'll drop a note at the talkpage. --Slp1 (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.