Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony J. Mifsud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Anthony J. Mifsud

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Total lack of reliable sources, questionable notability, and edited extensively by User:Mifmaster, who appears to have a conflict of interest. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP It is notable. Its lacks in references, but that is no reason for deletion. Ijanderson977 (talk) 12:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep has won awards, seems to meet WP:BIO.  Gtstricky Talk or C 13:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral - interview here.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 17:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP Everything is verifiable. I am extremely dissapointed that this article is being considered for deletion. It really seems to be a mission on Stifle's part to delete this article. I believe that all the information provided can be supported. There are many many more articles in Wikipedia that provide less information and less verifiable facts. I'd be more than willing to challenge Stifle on this point. menright63 (User talk:menright63) 22:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Relax People have different opinions on what should be included here and what shouldn't. This article really has no chance of being deleted, but will have a much better chance of surviving if you calm down and focus on why it should be kept.Beach drifter (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment menright63 is the articles original creator and also has an apparent COI. Beach drifter (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I've been watching this article for a while and honestly never liked it. I removed tons of content last week to clean it up, as originally it was pretty bad. However it seems to pretty clearly meet inclusion guidelines. It could use some better sources. My main problem is that the original article is exactly what is in the actor's Bio at IMDB. I'm not sure which was created first, and CorenBot never tagged it. As the article stands now there still may be copyright issues, as it is still the same as the IMDB info, less the text I removed.Beach drifter (talk) 02:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.