Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Jakobs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 18:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Anthony Jakobs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

To me this teen BLP would have been a db-person candidate, as I can't find any WP:CCS no matter how much leeway I give it. But since it was curated on NPP with the addition of notability I bring it here. Searching for sources I find nothing useful that would make subject meet WP:GNG/WP:BASIC or WP:FILMMAKER or WP:NACTOR. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly not notable. Searches returned zero hits for him (except for one, which I'll get to in a moment), so fails WP:GNG. Doesn't come close to passing WP:NACTOR. Article is clearly promotional. Didn't know there was a restriction for A7'ing an article after it had been tagged for notability. I don't think I've ever done it, but didn't know there was some guideline against it. Only that you can't re-add a prod tag. Now, about that single hit: imdb.com. This imdb.com is the poster child for why imdb.com is not a reliable source. Obviously self-published and self-promotional, it reads like the resume of a friend I had in high school who was trying to puff themselves up for agents. In fact, I'm bookmarking his imdb.com page so I can bring it up anytime there's a question about imdb's notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment To the best of my knowledge it would in this specific case not have been wrong to A7-tag it instead of coming here. Would any other user find that there is a CSS and remove the speedy? Open question. If yes, PROD would have been the next step in the DELPRO. I have no idea why one of our most active NPPers skip both speedy and PROD with this one. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - having "followers" on Instagram doesn't make one notable. A cameo (!) appearance in an untitled (!) film idem. Mixing someone else's music without release idem. I deleted this "He has also stated that King Charlegmagne is one of his ancestors." crazy self-promo, as virtually every white person in Europe (and so US/Canada and the rest of the world) is related to him (8th century AD). Tisquesusa (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged as I certainly would've tagged this as such, if it wasn't that Speedied have been simply removed recently thus I tagged and watchlisted until I nominated for deletion. Certainly deletion material. SwisterT'''wister   talk  18:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment A7 should not be used when the consensus driven deletion discussion has commenced. Please clarify I certainly would've tagged this as such, if it wasn't that Speedied have been simply removed recently, I do not understand what you intend to say. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON making short films with friends is good experience but not notable yet Atlantic306 (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG by a mile and wouldn't satisfy WP:ENT either. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is not notable enough.Vincelord (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.