Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Kasozi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Anthony Kasozi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources actually discussing the subject to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered are all unhelpful for various, most because the publications fail to meet our requirement for reliable sources with reputations for fact-checking and editorial control. A few of them fail because they're primary. Msnicki (talk) 06:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: I did find one academic journal review, but other than that it's fairly slow going. I found a mention here, but it's in passing and it's not in-depth enough to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I also found this, which looked promising until I realized that the website looks like it's the type that is predominantly focused on selling various services, which makes it suspect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:55, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Other than the one academic review there really isn't anything out there to show that Kasozi is all that notable. There are brief mentions here and there, but never in any form that would show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  16:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   13:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.