Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Labruna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Anthony Labruna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This AfD was created on June 15 but was malformed and did not get properly listed here. I am recreating it as a courtesy. The original reason for AfD was: "The subject does not appear to be BLP level notable, has not attracted substantial 3rd party notice since the announcement of his appointment, and appears unlikely to become more notable in the near future. If this changes, of course, we can recreate the page. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with @BrxBrx: ) 6:42 pm, 15 June 2020, last Monday (6 days ago) (UTC−7)" MelanieN (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Coverage is about the administration's hiring of unqualified individuals, not that the individuals are themselves notable. Routine news about the goings-on of low-level staffers. Reywas92Talk 21:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Keep I believe the article meets WP:GNG. The individual has received coverage from reliable sources such as Politico, The Hill, Slate, and MSNBC. Labruna is notable for being a very young person installed into a fairly notable position in the Trump administration. KidAd (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete This at best clearly fails not news guidelines. The deputy liasion to anyting is never notable. This is a low down entry level position, and the holder of it is never notable, and nothing else Lebruna has done yet rises to the level of notabilty either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  16:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per not news and Johnpatricklambert. The position and person are simply not notable. --Kbabej (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.