Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Peake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Only strong keep argument is based on inherited notability. The Bushranger One ping only 00:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Anthony Peake

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable, could not find any sources that go into details. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR. Current article would need to be fundamentally re-written to be encyclopedic: it presents fringe views with little reference to the mainstream, contrary to WP:VALID throughout it's short content. IRWolfie- (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. IRWolfie- (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The references to Peake are mostly his own web site or third hand mentions of him. They are not coverage from WP:RS and don't prove his WP:N. --Artene50 (talk) 08:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Hue  Sat  Lum  20:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 11:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep There's enough here to suggest possible notability. I advocate keep for now.  Squareanimal (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Mild Keep Notable according to Bruce Greyson and Ervin László, both of whom wrote forewords for him. He has a media profile here that could yield more references. K2709 (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Having people (especially people who have dubious notability themselves), write forewords to books doesn't indicate notability. What we have is a complete lack of reliable sources giving significant coverage to this topic (I had a look at his media profile and couldn't spot any reliable sources), thus failing WP:GNG, and failing WP:AUTHOR too. IRWolfie- (talk) 14:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 22:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is a biography of a living person and I can't find any evidence of any independent sources that pass WP:RS.— S Marshall  T/C 20:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.