Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Reynolds (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, technically speaking, unsourced BLP--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Anthony Reynolds (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. Refs are IMDb and own web-site. Looks like a non-notable bit-part actor. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 12:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. no major films.  DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, he has 56 credits. He had a memorable role as Officer Wedge in Prisoners. He also has an increasing profile. Karl Twist (talk) 11:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – Being a "journeyman" (guest) actor is no guarantee of independent press and media coverage. Quite the opposite in fact. But nothing here suggests meeting WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I intended to comment earlier multiple times, examining this again simply found nothing else actually convincing and there's nothing at all particular for independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  23:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to find independent reliable coverage in the media and is unable to qualify for WP:NACTOR. Also, Wikipedia is not a platform for predicting the future notability of a given subject WP:CRYSTAL. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.