Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthroconservatism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Anthroconservatism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Neologism with no evidence of notability - was deprodded, brought here for RHaworth Hekerui (talk) 13:44, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is spam for a recently created blog. Nothing else. &mdash; RHaworth 17:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - zero evidence of notability, with No way to source it from Internet sources. It appears to be made up on one day. Bearian (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional article to boost a blog.  Them From  Space  03:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. "A new form of conservative thought." WP:MADEUP, anyone? Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unreferenced, unwikified essay. Carrite (talk) 16:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:MADEUP, and the article gives no indication as to how the book Darwinian Conservatism has anything to do with Anthroconservatism. Steamroller Assault (talk) 04:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;non-notable neologism. –Grondemar 05:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; no chance of keeping in current state. DKqwerty (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete article doesnt provide adequate references, and search for this word brings no notable usage. no prejudice to recreation in a few years if it catches on, but its not used currently.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.